PackerNation.org

Analysis, Opinions, News, and Occasional Rants

Why Randy Moss Is Not The Answer For Green Bay

Print the article

This entry was posted on 3/24/2007 4:27 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

I don't want Randy Moss on the Packers, I'll be upfront honest about that.  Even if he still had the skills that made him the league's premiere deep threat I wouldn't want him.....I think there's a reason he's never been a winner at any level.   But that's a subject for another day.

What I wanted to share with you today was this little graph courtesy of footballoutsiders.com.    They do this little statistical trick of looking at Moss's past three seasons and then comparing him with other players who have a similar profile, age-wise and performance wise.   Here's what it looks like:

Similarity scores are a tool used to compare people to other players who posted similar numbers over a given time period. A quick glance at Moss’ three-year similarity profile is very alarming. (Only yards are listed, but similarity scores also compare catches, touchdowns, and average yards per catch.)

Name Years Yards Yr 1-3 Age +1 G+1 Rec +1 Yds+1
Randy Moss 2004-06 767, 1005, 553 30 ??? ??? ???
Drew Pearson 1978-80 714, 1026, 568 30 16 38 614
Sam McCullum 1979-81 739, 874, 567 30 11* 21* 233*
James Jett 1997-99 804, 882, 552 30 11 20 356
Freddie Solomon 1980-82 658, 969, 574* 30 13 31 662
Ernie Jones 1990-92 724, 957, 559 29 10 5 56
Nat Moore 1978-80 645, 840, 564 30 13 26 452
Andre Rison 1996-98 593, 1092, 542 32 15 21 218
Webster Slaughter 1990-92 847, 906, 486 29 14 77 904
Antonio Freeman 2000-02 912, 818, 600 31 15 14 141
Ernest Givins 1992-94 787, 887, 521 31 9 29 280
Earnest Gray 1982-84 757*, 1139, 529 28 5 3 22
*(Pro-rated for strike)


You can see that this group of receivers were pretty decent, although not All-World like Moss was in his prime.   But I think that you can't look at this and be confident that Moss is still going to be able to bring the magic.   As it says in the article, Moss isn't a work-out warrior, isn't a physical receiver, and isn't a great technician.   He's succeeded with blinding speed and leaping ability.   He's unlikely to age gracefully wherever he goes.

You add that to all his other negatives and I really think that bringing him onboard is a bad, bad plan.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.