Why Randy Moss Is Not The Answer For Green Bay
This entry was posted on 3/24/2007 4:27 PM and is filed under uncategorized.
I don't want Randy Moss on the Packers, I'll be upfront honest about that. Even if he still had the skills that made him the league's premiere deep threat I wouldn't want him.....I think there's a reason he's never been a winner at any level. But that's a subject for another day.
What I wanted to share with you today was this little graph courtesy of footballoutsiders.com. They do this little statistical trick of looking at Moss's past three seasons and then comparing him with other players who have a similar profile, age-wise and performance wise. Here's what it looks like:
Similarity scores are a tool used to compare people to other players who posted similar numbers over a given time period. A quick glance at Moss’ three-year similarity profile is very alarming. (Only yards are listed, but similarity scores also compare catches, touchdowns, and average yards per catch.)
| Name |
Years |
Yards Yr 1-3 |
Age +1 |
G+1 |
Rec +1 |
Yds+1 |
| Randy Moss |
2004-06 |
767, 1005, 553 |
30 |
??? |
??? |
??? |
| Drew Pearson |
1978-80 |
714, 1026, 568 |
30 |
16 |
38 |
614 |
| Sam McCullum |
1979-81 |
739, 874, 567 |
30 |
11* |
21* |
233* |
| James Jett |
1997-99 |
804, 882, 552 |
30 |
11 |
20 |
356 |
| Freddie Solomon |
1980-82 |
658, 969, 574* |
30 |
13 |
31 |
662 |
| Ernie Jones |
1990-92 |
724, 957, 559 |
29 |
10 |
5 |
56 |
| Nat Moore |
1978-80 |
645, 840, 564 |
30 |
13 |
26 |
452 |
| Andre Rison |
1996-98 |
593, 1092, 542 |
32 |
15 |
21 |
218 |
| Webster Slaughter |
1990-92 |
847, 906, 486 |
29 |
14 |
77 |
904 |
| Antonio Freeman |
2000-02 |
912, 818, 600 |
31 |
15 |
14 |
141 |
| Ernest Givins |
1992-94 |
787, 887, 521 |
31 |
9 |
29 |
280 |
| Earnest Gray |
1982-84 |
757*, 1139, 529 |
28 |
5 |
3 |
22 |
| *(Pro-rated for strike) |
You can see that this group of receivers were pretty decent, although not All-World like Moss was in his prime. But I think that you can't look at this and be confident that Moss is still going to be able to bring the magic. As it says in the article, Moss isn't a work-out warrior, isn't a physical receiver, and isn't a great technician. He's succeeded with blinding speed and leaping ability. He's unlikely to age gracefully wherever he goes.
You add that to all his other negatives and I really think that bringing him onboard is a bad, bad plan.